van cleve research group

theoretical evolution & ecology @ university of kentucky

an integral of the 'heron' function
Landscapes

Publications

  • Thomson L, Espinosa DP, Brandvain Y, Van Cleve J. 2024. Linked selection and the evolution of altruism in family-structured populations. Ecology and Evolution. 14(2):e10980. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.10980
  • Van Cleve J. 2023. Evolutionarily stable strategy analysis and its links to demography and genetics through invasion fitness. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 378(1876):20210496. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2021.0496
  • Greene KM, Van Cleve J, Price SJ. 2023. Salamander movement propensity resists effects of supraseasonal drought. Ichthyology & Herpetology. 111(1):109–118. https://doi.org/10.1643/h2022051
  • McGlothlin JW et al. 2022. A synthesis of game theory and quantitative genetic models of social evolution. Journal of Heredity. 113(1):109–119. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhered/esab064
  • Tate AT, Van Cleve J. 2022. Bet-hedging in innate and adaptive immune systems. Evolution, Medicine, and Public Health. 10(1):256–265. https://doi.org/10.1093/emph/eoac021
  • Andris C et al. 2021. Threads across the urban fabric: Youth mentorship relationships as neighborhood bridges. Journal of Urban Affairs. 43(1):77–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2019.1662726
  • Dunoyer LA, Seifert AW, Van Cleve J. 2021. Evolutionary bedfellows: Reconstructing the ancestral state of autotomy and regeneration. Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution. 336(2):94–115. https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.b.22974
  • Akçay E, Van Cleve J. 2021. Internalizing cooperative norms in group-structured populations. In: Brosnan SF, Wilczynski W, editors. Cooperation and Conflict: The Interaction of Opposites in Shaping Social Behavior. Cambridge University Press; p 26–44. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108671187.004
  • Van Cleve J. 2020. Building a synthetic basis for kin selection and evolutionary game theory using population genetics. Theoretical Population Biology. 133:65–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tpb.2020.03.001
  • Altenberg L et al. 2019. Some topics in theoretical population genetics: Editorial commentaries on a selection of Marc Feldman’s TPB papers. Theoretical Population Biology. 129:4–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tpb.2018.10.003
  • Estrela S et al. 2019. Environmentally mediated social dilemmas. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 34(1):6–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2018.10.004
  • Van Cleve J. 2017. Stags, hawks, and doves: social evolution theory and individual variation in cooperation. Integrative and Comparative Biology. 57(3):566–579. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icx071
  • Lehmann L, Mullon C, Akçay E, Van Cleve J. 2016. Invasion fitness, inclusive fitness, and reproductive numbers in heterogeneous populations. Evolution. 70(8):1689–1702. https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.12980
  • Wilkins JF, Úbeda F, Van Cleve J. 2016. The evolving landscape of imprinted genes in humans and mice: Conflict among alleles, genes, tissues, and kin. BioEssays. 38(5):482–489. https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.201500198
  • Van Cleve J. 2016. Cooperation, conformity, and the coevolutionary problem of trait associations. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 396:13–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2016.02.012
  • Akçay E, Van Cleve J. 2016. There is no fitness but fitness, and the lineage is its bearer. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B. 371(1687):20150085. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0085
  • Akçay E, Linksvayer TA, Van Cleve J. 2015. Bridging social evolution theory and emerging empirical approaches to social behavior. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences. 6:59–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2015.09.002
  • Van Cleve J. 2015. Social evolution and genetic interactions in the short and long term. Theoretical Population Biology. 103:2–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tpb.2015.05.002
  • Van Cleve J, Weissman DB. 2015. Measuring ruggedness in fitness landscapes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 112(24):7345–7346. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1507916112
  • Servedio MR et al. 2014. Not just a Theory—The utility of mathematical models in evolutionary biology. PLoS Biology. 12(12):e1002017. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002017
  • Van Cleve J, Akçay E. 2014. Pathways to social evolution: reciprocity, relatedness, and synergy. Evolution. 68(8):2245–2258. https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.12438
  • Van Cleve J, Lehmann L. 2013. Stochastic stability and the evolution of coordination in spatially structured populations. Theoretical Population Biology. 89:75–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tpb.2013.08.006
  • Akçay E, Van Cleve J. 2012. Behavioral responses in structured populations pave the way to group optimality. American Naturalist. 179(2):257–269. https://doi.org/10.1086/663691
  • Brandvain Y, Van Cleve J, Úbeda F, Wilkins JF. 2011. Demography, kinship, and the evolving theory of genomic imprinting. Trends in Genetics. 27(7):251–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2011.04.005
  • Liberman U, Van Cleve J, Feldman MW. 2011. On the evolution of mutation in changing environments: recombination and phenotypic switching. Genetics. 187(3):837–51. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.110.123620
  • Van Cleve J, Feldman MW, Lehmann L. 2010. How demography, life history, and kinship shape the evolution of genomic imprinting. American Naturalist. 176(4):440–55. https://doi.org/10.1086/656277
  • Salathé M, Van Cleve J, Feldman MW. 2009. Evolution of stochastic switching rates in asymmetric fitness landscapes. Genetics. 182(4):1159–64. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.109.103333
  • Akçay E, Van Cleve J, Feldman MW, Roughgarden J. 2009. A theory for the evolution of other-regard integrating proximate and ultimate perspectives. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 106(45):19061–19066. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0904357106
  • Van Cleve J, Feldman MW. 2008. Stable long-period cycling and complex dynamics in a single-locus fertility model with genomic imprinting. Journal of Mathematical Biology. 57(2):243–264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-008-0156-4
  • Van Cleve J, Feldman MW. 2007. Sex-specific viability, sex linkage and dominance in genomic imprinting. Genetics. 176(2):1101–1118. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.107.071555
  • Guralnick R, Van Cleve J. 2005. Strengths and weaknesses of museum and national survey data sets for predicting regional species richness: comparative and combined approaches. Diversity and Distributions. 11(4):349–359. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1366-9516.2005.00164.x